Translate

Friday, July 20, 2018

Beamed propulsion doable now, and with it space solar power.

Copyright 2018 Robert Clark
(patents pending)

  A dream of advocates of low cost space access has been beam propulsion of various types, whether laser, microwave, or particle beams. 

This image displays how beamed microwave technology could be used to launch payloads into space. Source: Escape Dynamics



 The problem has been the size of the laser beam installation needed to launch sizable payloads has been prohibitive.

 The standard estimate for how much payload you can send to orbit with laser-propulsion is 1 kg in payload for 1 megawatt (MW) of laser power. See for example this report by the late Jordin Kare:  

Modular Laser Launch Architecture: Analysis and Beam Module Design. 
Final Report 
USRA Subcontract Agreement No. 07605-003-015 
30 April 2004 Revised 18 May 2004 
Dr. Jordin T. Kare 
Kare Technical Consulting 
908 15th Ave. East jtkare@****.*** 
Seattle, WA 98112 206-323-0795 

 By this measure to launch a 5 metric ton capsule payload would require 5 gigawatts of laser power. In a follow up post I'll discuss some methods that might decrease the amount of power required.

 A further consideration about the power requirements is that if done via some type of gas generator these are typically only about 33% efficient in conversion to electricity, so it would actually take 15 gigawatts. This would be like a nuclear power plant installation. Another possibility would be to use large chemical engines such as the SSME's to generate the heat energy which would then be converted to electrical energy. Three SSME's generated in the range of 27 gigawatts. This would suffice for in the range of a 9 metric ton payload.

 It would take about a day to refurbish the engines for another shot, and then there would only be in the range of 100 shots possible based on the reusability of the SSME's. Considering this would be the primary cost and the vehicle itself would be highly reusable this would still result in a substantial reduction in launch cost.

 Another possibility might be the nine engines of the Falcon 9. These also produce in the range of gigawatts of power. They are also intended to be reusable. But reportedly the number of reuses will only be in the few dozen range.

  As I mentioned, the primary impediment to sizable payload laser propulsion has been the costs of the large laser installation. Currently, the costs for lasers are in the range $15 per watt. Then for 5 gigawatts of laser power that would be $75 billion. That's too much development cost for a single launch installation.

 However, a key new advance may bring the laser cost within what is feasible. The key advance is in the realm of microscale LED's that have remarkably high power density per area:

InfiniLED MicroLEDs achieve 300 W/cm2 output density from tiny source.
The MicroLEDs semiconductor manufacturing process includes construction of a
parabolic reflector to enable optimal light control and high efficiency from
micro-meter-sized LEDs.
Published on:Jan 29, 2013
By Maury Wright
https://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/infiniled-microleds-achieve-300-w-cm-sup-2-sup-output-density-from-tiny-source.html

 The report discusses micro-scale LED's whose light output scales up to 300 W per square centimeter, 3 megawatts per square meter. So a gigawatt could be produced from an array 30 meters on a side. 

 Another article on the InfiniLED's:

Products, Materials & Tools | Jan 21, 2013
InfiniLED MicroLEDs achieve Ultra-High Light Intensity.
InfiniLED’s latest MicroLEDs (µLEDs) have produced record optical beam intensity. This new device is capable of producing up to 1mW of light from a single 20µm pixel at 405nm. This is equivalent to a light output density of more than 300 W/cm2 – the highest recorded for a commercially available LED type device.
A cluster of 25 MicroLEDs beside the tip of a needle. The parabolic reflector shape can be seen in the inset close-up
https://www.led-professional.com/products/leds_led_modules/infiniled-microleds-achieve-ultra-high-light-intensity

 From the appearance of these micro-scale LED's, they should permit simple automated production to produce many copies to cover a macro-scale area to generate light even at gigawatt power levels.

  A description of the mode of operation of the microLED:

MicroLED Sources Enable Diverse Ultralow-Power Applications.
Photonics Spectra
Oct 2013
DR. WILLIAM HENRY, INFINILED

Figure 1. This microLED cross section shows total internal reflection leading to high extraction efficiency through a single surface.


Figure 2. A cluster of 25 microLEDs beside the tip of a needle.

https://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=55014

 However, for laser propulsion to be useful the beam has to be focused on the target spacecraft. This is possible for the coherent light of a laser. However, it turns out what is only really needed is for the light to be collimated, that is, consisting of parallel beams, and the light produced by these microLED arrays is collimated. From the "InfiniLED MicroLEDs achieve 300 W/cm2 output density from tiny source" article:

The MicroLED is built using an LED semiconductor structure and can be
driven like standard LEDs. But the manufacturing process, which includes
etching of a parabolic reflector at the semiconductor level, delivers a
collimated beam like a laser (see the parabolic structure in the nearby
photo). The result is both high-intensity light and high efficiency.
"This device can be seen as a cross-over between the power and collimation
of a laser and the simplicity of an LED. The unique devices enable a range
of applications," said chief commercial officer of InfiniLED, Bill Henry.
"InfiniLED are proud to have achieved the landmark performance of optical
density greater than 300 W/cm2. This was achieved without the need for
external optics indicating the potential for further improvement of the
performance."


 This means the light rays are parallel. But this is what is needed for the light to be focused to a point (Airy disk) using a parabolic mirror. It doesn't really need to be coherent like a laser. Not actually having to make it be a laser inherently makes it a simpler and cheaper system. However, we will need to array many copies of the MicroLED's to create a large beam. But when the pattern is repeated, likely the degree of collimation will be degraded somewhat over the entire size of the array. That needs to be determined. 

 Still, even if there is a lack of collimation over a large array, we can produce a large collimated beam from the individual collimated beams using an optical element called a collimator:

Collimated light.


 There is the question of whether non-coherent light will have worse disperion through the atmosphere. However, this report discusses experimentation that suggests atmospheric dispersion is actually worse for lasers than for noncoherent light generated by LED's. See for instance the video in Fig. 2 on this page:

Optical communications using coherent and non-coherent light. 
http://modulatedlight.org/optical_comms/optical_about.html

  Another possible advantage of just using LED's rather than going for a laser is that LED's can have high efficiency, as much as 80%, though the efficiency of the InfiniLED's isn't specified. Lasers on the other hand typically only have an efficiency of 30%.

  There is also the cost advantage of just using LED's instead of actual lasers. The cost for LED's is about $1 per watt. Then potentially the cost of the beam itself might only $5 billion for the 5 gigawatt installation for a 5 metric ton launcher. This is within the range for the development cost of a new orbital launcher. 

 However, the microLED's are a new development so their cost might be above the $1 per watt level. Still, Apple is expected to start soon on large scale production of microLED's for use in cell phones, tablets, and TV screens. This will tend to drive down costs.

 The large power requirements would be for launching large payloads such as manned capsules. But there is a market for small payloads. In fact, the DoD has funded programs to develop launchers for payloads in the range of 25 kg to 40 kg at a ca. $1 million launch cost. None of the funded programs have succeeded so far but this cost and size range should now be well within the capabilities of laser launch. A 25 kg payload at the 1 MW per kg measure would require 25 megawatts of laser power, or perhaps of 75 megawatts of thermal power if the electrical power required is provided by a gas turbine.

 But gas turbines at this power range are available for sale at the few tens of millions of dollars cost range:

http://nyethermodynamics.com/trader/kwprice.htm

 Since these are designed to operate continually they could provide thousands of shots. They would also satisfy the DoD requirement of "launch on demand".

Laser Defense Application.
 With Iran and North Korea possibly acquiring the capability to deliver nuclear tipped ICBM's, the need for missile defense becomes more urgent. A promising program for this wound up being cancelled:

27 Sep 2017 | 15:11 GMT
Laser Weapons Not Yet Ready for Missile Defense.
Prototype laser weapons can zap drones from the sky. But they won't protect the U.S. from North Korean nuclear missiles.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/no-quick-laser-missile-defense

 This was a megawatt-class laser carried on a modified 747. However, to be effective it would have to have 20 to 30 times more power than that. But the InfiniLED's can manage 3 megawatts per square meter. So to get a 20 megawatt beam you would only need a 2.5 by 2.5 meter array of InfiniLED's.

 There was also a problem with the power requirements at lightweight as discussed here:

Reasons to Doubt Laser Missile Defense.
ARMS CONTROL NOW
Authored by Ryan Fedasiuk and Kingston Reif on May 14, 2018
https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2018-05-14/reasons-doubt-laser-missile-defense

 The weight required for the power production had to be decreased almost by a factor of ten to the range of 5 kg per kilowatt. The microLED's themselves would be quite lightweight so the question remains about the power production and conversion to electricity.

 As described here we already have well above this capability for power production/conversion:

Nuclear powered VASIMR and plasma propulsion doable now.
https://exoscientist.blogspot.com/2015/08/nuclear-powered-vasimr-and-plasma.html

See for instance the listed examples here:

Power-to-weight ratio.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-to-weight_ratio

 Both the heat engines in converting thermal energy to mechanical energy and electric generators in converting mechanical to electrical energy are well above the required power to weight ratio.

Space Solar Power Application.
  In this blog post I suggested we have the capability for space-based solar power:

Economical Space Solar Power Now Possible.
http://exoscientist.blogspot.com/2014/04/economical-space-solar-power-now_19.html

 The reason was the huge mass thought to be needed for lofting the required solar cells can be drastically reduced by using nanotube-based mirrors as solar collectors to focus the light on much smaller solar cells. 

 Now with beamed propulsion the cost to orbit is reduced even further, in fact approaching just the energy cost to orbit with multiple launches. With orbital assembly you wouldn't need gigawatt,  multiton launch installations. You could send very many tens to hundreds of kilo mass payloads to orbit to be assembled into the solar collector arrays. With the payloads in this size range you could use gas turbines to provide the power supply to make continuous launches.

 However, a key aspect was left out of that earlier post: the transmission of the power back to Earth. But we now have the capability of making high power collimated light beams at lightweight as well.


    Bob Clark


18 comments:

  1. Bob - 15 GW would be an unprecedented nuclear power plant - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_power_stations

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Yes. I wanted to give an idea of the size of the power plants required. By the way, when power plant power levels are cited it’s usually the electric power level given. So for 5 gigawatts electrical power to the beam installation, you would need a 5 gigawatts power plant.

      This still would rank among the highest power plant levels in the world of any type, nuclear, hydroelectric, coal, gas turbines, etc. Power plants of this size are constructed to serve entire cities of million plus populations and cost several billions of dollars. It seems unrealistic to construct one this size just for launching rockets.

      So in a follow up post I’ll discuss methods of reducing the required power levels.

      Bob Clark

      Delete
  2. There was a company named escape dynamics that was planning something like this, but they decided to close shop

    On a subreddit i once posted some rough estimates and an idea to use LOx injection to boost the liftoff thrust.

    Basically making a hydrolox rocket with 680s isp.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that. It might be possible to get get more intense collimated microwave beams as well by using the same idea of using transmitters and parabolic antennas at the micro scale to nanoscale.

      Bob Clark

      Delete
  3. https://www.reddit.com/r/escapedynamics/comments/3gpclg/weight_of_the_250kg_to_leo_craft_and_thoughts/

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well explained about mode of operation of the microLED. I love reading about solar power. There are so many countries developing solar power house for saving electricity.
    eva foam sheet manufacturer in india

    ReplyDelete
  10. The post are really good, and wonderful to visit your site.
    SAFEALL Audio & Video Intercom Systems

    ReplyDelete
  11. I found that site very usefull and this survey is very cirious, I ' ve never seen a blog that demand a survey for this actions, very curious... Zonnepanelen

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here keep up the good work Zonnepanelen

    ReplyDelete
  13. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or tips. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it! Zonnepanelen

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is a great inspiring article.I am pretty much pleased with your good work.You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. Looking to reading your next post. Zonnepanelen installateur

    ReplyDelete
  15. This was among the best posts and episode from your team it let me learn many new things. Zonnepanelen installateur

    ReplyDelete
  16. I am hoping the same best effort from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing skills has inspired me. Zonnepanelen

    ReplyDelete