*Copyright 2016 Robert Clark*

*In the blog post "A SpaceX Heavy Lift Methane Rocket, Page 2", I proposed some architectures for a Mars transport rocket. This was based on a quite large 1,800,000 lb. vacuum thrust of the methane-powered Raptor.*

However, recently Elon Musk discussed the current version of the SpaceX Mars transport model called the Interplanetary Transport System (ITS). Here they are going back to a smaller version of the Raptor, at ca. 660,000 lb. vacuum thrust. In this version however, their booster will be quite large at ca. 7,000 metric tons (mT) gross weight.

Because of the reduced size of the Raptor this will require 42 engines on the booster. However, interestingly the size of the upper stage will be similar to the size of the booster I discussed in "A SpaceX Heavy Lift Methane Rocket, Page 2".

**So you could get a Mars launch booster by using this upper stage instead as a booster.**
But because of the smaller engines in the SpaceX formulation they will use nine of the Raptors on the upper stage. I stated in the earlier blog post I wanted to use at most 5 of the larger Raptor engines to emulate the safety record of the 5 large engines on the Saturn V booster. However, SpaceX seems to have gotten the 9 engines on the Falcon 9 to work, and in any case you could just use the booster to send the cargo and habitats to space and use high safety rockets to launch the crew to meet up with the transport craft in space.

The objection could be made however, that this is supposed to be just an upper stage, not a booster stage. However, at his IAC presentation of this Mars transport system he stated that the upper stage in both the spaceship and tanker form could be SSTO. Furthermore, the tanker he said could be used a fast intercontinental transport craft. This means necessarily they would have to be able to launch from the ground. So it is not too much of stretch to assume they could be used as a first stage.

An advantage of making this smaller upper stage the actual booster is that Elon has said they will have a development craft within 4 years. So if we make now a smaller upper stage to go with it, we could have a valid Mars transport craft at that early date. If we made this new upper stage correspondingly 1/3rd size, then we would be able to get 1/3rd the crew size to Mars, so a crew of ca. 35 to Mars.

However, interestingly we might be able to use already existing upper stages on existing rockets for the upper stage, for instance possibly the famous Centaur upper stage used on the Atlas V or the Ariane 5 core itself used here as an upper stage.

We can estimate how much we could get to LEO using the ITS tanker as the booster and the Ariane 5 core as the upper stage. The required delta-v to LEO is 30,000 ft/sec about 9,100 m/s:

Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines, p.12

Then for the propellant and dry mass values for the ITS tanker and Ariane 5 core we could get 225 metric tons to LEO:

382*9.81ln(1 + 2500/(90 + 170 + 225)) + 465*9.81ln(1 + 158/(12 + 225)) = 9,140 m/s.

This makes clear another key advantage of this architecture: whereas the original SpaceX ITS would require five flights of the ITS to refuel the upper stage spaceship,

*with this smaller version a single flight would be able to carry the spaceship to orbit as well as its fuel for its flight towards Mars.*

But what would be the crew size for this smaller upper stage? We can estimate it by making a comparison to the delta-v possible in accordance with the stats of the ITS spaceship:

382*9.81ln(1 + 1950/(150 + 450)) = 5,400 m/s.

So we want the Ariane 5 case to be able to reach a delta-v of 5,400 m/s when fully refueled and firing in space headed towards Mars:

465*9.81ln(1 +158/(12 +55)) = 5,500 m/s.

So this is a payload of about 55 metric tons. This is about 1/8th the mass for the ITS case, so we can estimate the crew size to be 1/8th also, so to a crew of 12.

Elon in his IAC presentation says the ITS carrying its 100 member crew might be able to reach Mars in 80 days at a particular close Mars opposition. This is dependent on the departure delta-v however. In the blog post "Propellant depots for interplanetary flight". I noted that at a higher departure delta-v possible by using a smaller 6 metric ton habitat for only a crew of 3, the Ariane 5 used as the in space propulsion stage might be able to make it to Mars in only 35 days, when leaving at such a particularly close Mars opposition.

Bob Clark

"Payload" refers to complete payload system weight, including any necessary payload attachment fittings or multiple payload adapters

This is an estimate based on the best publicly-available engineering and performance data, and should not be used for detailed mission planning. Operational constraints may reduce performance or preclude this mission.

So the calculator estimates 178 metric tons. This is less than the 225 metric ton estimate using just the rocket equation, but it still means a single flight could carry enough payload to fully refuel an Ariane 5 core upper stage for a flight to Mars.

Bob Clark

Bob Clark

**UPDATE, 10/15/2016:**

**Dr. John Schilling's launch performance calculator is back up. This allows us to produce a more accurate payload estimate. The vacuum thrust for the 382 Isp Raptor is 3.5 meganewtons, 3,500 kN. So 9 would be 31,500 kN. We'll also increase the vacuum thrust of the Vulcain engine on the Ariane 5 to 1,450 kN in accordance with the increased vacuum Isp of 465 s. Inputting these and the other specs in the calculator results in:**Launch Vehicle: | User-Defined Launch Vehicle |
---|---|

Launch Site: | Cape Canaveral / KSC |

Destination Orbit: | 185 x 185 km, 28 deg |

Estimated Payload: | 177767 kg |

95% Confidence Interval: | 150063 - 210818 kg |

"Payload" refers to complete payload system weight, including any necessary payload attachment fittings or multiple payload adapters

This is an estimate based on the best publicly-available engineering and performance data, and should not be used for detailed mission planning. Operational constraints may reduce performance or preclude this mission.

So the calculator estimates 178 metric tons. This is less than the 225 metric ton estimate using just the rocket equation, but it still means a single flight could carry enough payload to fully refuel an Ariane 5 core upper stage for a flight to Mars.

Bob Clark

First off, this calculation is completely wrong:

ReplyDelete382*9.81ln(1 + 2500/(90 + 170 + 225)) + 465*9.81ln(1 + 158/(12 + 225)) = 9,140 m/s.

Second stage starting mass is smaller than final mass. First stage engines would even with altitude compensation get at most 370s on average. In this case first stage does about 6.1km/s, dry mass of second stage with payload would then be 206t. Even less with realistic 370s isp first stage.

Secondly, that first stage needs about 10% of its fuel as landing reserve. Depending on downrange landing site. If it can even land with a modified upper part from where the second stage took off. Heatshield would need to open as a fairing for this to work both as first stage and hypersonic lander.

Whole point about the system seems to be cost. As it comes down to about 200% of overall fuel cost. 9$ per kilogram of fuel delivered to orbit is ridiculously low.

If the tanker craft is to be used as a first stage, with a reusable upper stage, the ratios would probably be close to those with ITS.

Even using your numbers you could get a fully fueled Ariane 5 core to LEO in a single launch. Note this for a first flight exploratory mission not a colonization mission. So we could have the booster be expendable.

DeleteUsing various adaptive, i.e., variable nozzles we could get the full 382 s vacuum ISP of the Raptor. However, we have discussed before the validity of these approximations using the vacuum ISP for the altitude compensating case when they were developed for a fixed nozzle case.

On the one hand they could overestimate the payload because the approximations would be following an engine with a static nozzle with a higher sea level thrust. But on the other hand the adaptive nozzle case would have higher ISP during the upper pars of the flight.

It needs to be calculated using more accurate rocket trajectory software what will be the actual payload using adaptive nozzles. NASA has offered such software such as OTIS free to U.S. Citizens. It's highly non-user friendly, but I'll see what I can come up with.

Bob Clark